Tag Archives: publishing trends

Friday post

Last weeked we welcomed three kicking literary agents – Tina Wexler of ICM, Linda Pratt of Sheldon Fogelman, and Jennifer DeChiara of Jennifer DeChiara Literary  – to Agents Day in Kansas City. What a weekend!

Linda started off the morning with an excellent talk on how writing is a lot like hopscotch. One tip I found helpful was how to figure out if your pacing is too slow or tension too subtle. She suggested you write up a summary of what happens in each chapter, breaking it down by action.

Jennifer DeChiara stressed the importance of pitching and appearing like a pro when you meet an editor or agent, whether in person or on paper,  because you literally have seconds to wow them. (I hope to soon share some exciting news about a fellow writer who did just that!)

Tina Wexler reiterated much of what Jennifer and Linda said, but also reminded me of what I think is the most important thing a writer can bring to this process: the journey you take should be as fun as it is difficult.

They offered so much more, and I will skim my notes and post them in the days to come. These ladies would serve any writer well. On a personal note, the best part of the weekend was hanging out and chatting as women, not writers and agents.

And the food rocked, too. Thanks, Carla and Helen for pulling an all-nighter to make sure the sandwiches were as fresh as possible. And thanks, too, to Jeff, Dave, Daniel and Xander for hauling all the goods.

Now, swing by www.heartlandwriters.com and check out what’s up in KC.

Happy weekends, everyone!

 

 

sc_project=1904134;

sc_invisible=1;

sc_partition=17;

sc_security=”dbab2e32″;

web analytics

 

Commercial literature

I’ve been thinking all morning about HarperCollins’ new line of commercial fiction for 8 to 12 year old girls. After much pondering, I’ve come to this sort-of cohesive perspective.
 
When something goes against much of my values, I try to look at it from the other side. Why do the HarperCollins powers that be think this venture – books that promote specific products in order to potentially build a sort of “sponsored by” relationship – is a good idea?
 
OK, the first obvious choice for any venture is money. Yes, this scheme could potentially make money, lots of money, for book publishers fighting for consumer attention. More money means more flexibility to sign that wonderful new writer whose work might not have mass appeal but certainly is so stunning it needs to be out there. In an ideal world, that happens.
 
I do have faith there are editors out there who will continue to fight for excellent work that might not have mass appeal, and those who still recognize the diamond potential despite the more prevalent rough in new writers. Extra money could open more doors for these manuscripts. But I worry that making easy money will increasingly drive publishing decisions. It’s human nature: Take the easy path, even if it’s not necessarily the best road for the long run.
 
A possible second reason to pursue this product line is to build literacy. OK, I get that too. Commercially driven stories bring familiarity, or as the HC editor called it, authenticity. I’ll put aside my argument about defining it as “authenticity” for now and instead consider how such books might improve literacy.
 
Sure, a nonreader might pick up a book that mentions her favorite clothes, television shows, toys and so on. She might even read another. And if the planets align just so and we all hold our collective breath, perhaps she might even pick up a Paula Danzinger, or a Judy Blume, or – dare we hope it? – any one of the amazing new writers out there too.
 
I see the benefit. My boys devour Star Wars books. Kids like familiarity. But again, I worry about quality. Just like television, fluff rises to the top while more complex offerings that require thought or depth to fully appreciate get left at the bottom.

 

I struggle every day to teach my sons to think critically about the world around them and see the worth of their own opinions, mistakes, growth. It’s a battle to help them recognize the real goals of ever-prevalent advertising and marketing. I want them to value human qualities of loyalty, honesty, courage and compassion rather than appearances and material wealth.
 
I believe product-driven books demean everything that literature and reading stand for: independent thought, creativity, imagination. This venture promotes something that ultimately will lower the standards for what literature can and should accomplish.

 

Oh HarperCollins…

I don’t think this is what “commerical fiction” means.

Find a very thoughtful response from Finding Wonderland here, then swing over to Read Roger for some backlash

And thanks to Kelly Herold at Big A Little A, where I read it all first.